The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) will indirectly but materially raise the security bar for IoT products sold in North America, because global manufacturers will tend to converge on CRA‑compliant designs and lifecycle practices rather than maintain separate security baselines for different regions.
Why CRA matters outside Europe
The CRA applies to any “product with digital elements” placed on the EU market, regardless of where it is made, including consumer IoT, industrial systems, embedded software, and remote data processing components. Non‑compliant products can effectively be banned from EU sale and face penalties up to about €15M or 2.5% of global turnover, which strongly incentivizes multinationals to design once for global compliance.
Likely effects on North American IoT products
Security‑by‑design: CRA mandates that security is built in across the whole lifecycle of the product, not added later; this will push vendors serving EU and North America to modernize firmware, authentication, encryption, and secure boot across their entire global portfolio.
Long‑term support: Manufacturers must remain responsible for cybersecurity (including vulnerability handling and updates) for at least five years after placing a product on the market, which will encourage longer support windows and structured patch policies for devices sold in the US and Canada as well.
Secure update infrastructure: CRA effectively makes secure over‑the‑air firmware updates unavoidable for large fleets (e.g., smart meters), driving wider adoption of robust update pipelines, signing, and PKI that will also be used on North American SKUs.
Interaction with US/Canadian frameworks
CRA is emerging alongside the US IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act and NIST guidance, which already push baseline controls (secure development, vulnerability management, encryption, identity). Together, CRA and NIST‑aligned requirements create a de facto global baseline; North American buyers will increasingly demand CRA/NIS2‑aligned assurances even when not legally required, especially in critical infrastructure and enterprise procurement.
Market and supply‑chain implications in North America
Fewer “cheap, insecure” imports: Because products that cut corners on security risk will lose access to the EU market, many low‑end manufacturers will either upgrade security globally or gradually disappear from major retail channels, improving average IoT security in North America.
Converged certification and documentation: CRA pushes extensive documentation and potentially certification for products with digital elements; once that cost is paid, vendors are likely to reuse the same documentation and labeling to differentiate in US and Canadian markets as “CRA‑ready” or “EU‑grade secure.”
Cloud and platform influence: Large IoT platforms and hyperscalers are already positioning their services as aligned with CRA requirements, which means North American device makers using those platforms inherit stronger defaults in identity, monitoring, and vulnerability management.
What this means for North American security posture
For enterprises and utilities, CRA will make it easier to source IoT gear that meets a higher and more uniform security baseline, even when buying from non‑EU vendors. For consumers, security improvements may show up as more consistent update support, clearer security labeling, and fewer devices abandoned without patches, even though the legal driver is a European regulation.
CRA is likely to act as a global uplift mechanism: it will not regulate North America, but it will strongly shape how IoT devices used in North America are designed, supported, and marketed, including IoT lighting.
More information is available here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.