According to rebate experts BriteSwitch, commercial lighting rebates remain widely available and financially attractive in 2026, but programs are shifting toward deeper energy savings, controls, and away from legacy fluorescent technologies. Despite high LED penetration, many utilities still view lighting as a cost‑effective efficiency resource and are increasing many incentive levels to drive next‑generation retrofits and better designs.
About 75% of the United States is covered by at least one active commercial lighting rebate program in 2026, only slightly down from 77% the prior year, so most facilities can still qualify for incentives. A few large programs have exited or consolidated, but these are isolated cases and do not change the overall picture of largely nationwide coverage. Rebates remain a core tool for utilities looking to manage load and meet efficiency targets.
Average prescriptive lighting rebate amounts have risen significantly, with an overall 17% increase across product categories compared to last year. The largest jumps occur in applications replacing legacy HID systems, reflecting the big kWh reduction potential in high‑wattage retrofits. These higher payments are tied to inflation and tariffs on equipment, rising labor costs, and utilities’ urgency to capture more energy savings per project. On top of base incentives, 7% of programs started 2026 with bonus adders already in place—earlier in the year than usual—offering anywhere from roughly 10% extra to double the standard rebate and signaling pressure to drive early participation.
Program design is evolving away from simple per‑unit rebates and toward incentives calculated on energy savings, such as watts saved. There was a 6% shift away from flat lamp/fixture amounts toward these savings‑based models in 2026, and many of these new “calculated” rebates still sit under prescriptive tracks, so they do not require full custom M&V treatment. By rewarding higher efficacy and right‑sizing, utilities encourage designers to optimize light levels instead of doing one‑for‑one replacements, aligning incentives with good engineering practice. Even so, roughly half of all lighting incentives are still structured on a per‑unit basis, making it important to check each program’s rules at the project level.
As early LED installations from a decade ago reach end of life, demand for LED‑to‑LED upgrades is growing, and rebate programs are gradually responding. In 2026, there is a 22% increase in the number of programs that explicitly allow incentives for LED‑to‑LED retrofits, recognizing that new products can be up to about 50% more efficient than first‑generation systems. However, these still represent a minority of all programs; many others will only support such projects when incentives are tied to demonstrated energy savings, often requiring direct confirmation with the utility to verify eligibility.
Another notable trend is the sunsetting of rebates for fluorescent replacements in several large statewide programs, driven by state regulations restricting or banning linear fluorescent lamps. As those lamps leave the market, utilities can no longer justify incentivizing fluorescent‑to‑LED conversions in the same way, and some categories are being eliminated or redesigned. At the same time, incentives for lighting controls—especially simple devices like wall, remote, or fixture‑mounted sensors—have increased in the range of roughly 12–20%, emphasizing the continued push for controls‑based savings. Collectively, these changes show that 2026 rebates are still robust but increasingly focused on high‑impact retrofits, advanced LEDs, and controls rather than basic lamp swaps.
More information is available here.
Image above: Courtesy of BriteSwitch.
You must be logged in to post a comment.