The Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is currently examining a range of UV disinfection technologies. The goal of this work is to provide information that will help decision makers select UV products that are effective, safe, and energy efficient. A unique feature of this effort is the testing and evaluation of several UV disinfection products. This project is supported by members of the LRC’s Lighting Energy Alliance and the McClung Lighting Research Foundation.
To launch the project, the LRC administered an online survey asking about people’s experiences with and concerns about UV disinfection products. Responses to the survey were received from over 200 people in June and July 2020. The largest percentage of respondents were lighting specifiers (38%) followed by lighting manufacturers (28%). Also responding were energy service personnel (11%) and lighting manufacturers’ representatives and distributors (9%). A few responses came from educators (8%), architects (3%), HVAC professionals (2%), and architectural engineers (1%).
Primary job functions of UV survey respondents
In the survey, respondents were asked to select what they believed to be the three most promising types of UV disinfection products (Figure 2). The most popular choices were: upper-room air purification (58%), in-duct air purification (55%), surface disinfection integrated with light fixtures (45%), and surface disinfection from (dedicated) wall- or ceiling-mounted products (40%).
Survey respondents’ opinions about most promising UV disinfection products
Survey respondents were also asked to select what they viewed as the three most promising application types for UV disinfection (Figure 3). Most respondents (83%) selected healthcare applications. Half (50%) thought that transportation and long-term care (i.e., nursing home) facilities were a promising application for UV disinfection systems. Less than a third of respondents selected schools and colleges (33%), restaurant food service (31%), and office buildings (26%) among their top three rated application types.
Survey respondents’ opinions about most promising application types for UV disinfection
Finally, respondents were asked to select the three greatest concerns they had with UV disinfection technologies (Figure 4). Most respondents (81%) were concerned about product safety. Also of concern were field verification of effectiveness (62%) and overall effectiveness of UV products (53%). A third of respondents were concerned about damage to materials (33%) and the lack of clear building safety codes for use of UV disinfection in buildings (31%). Of lesser concern were ongoing maintenance (17%), high product cost (14%), and energy use (9%).
Survey respondents’ opinions about most promising application types for UV disinfection
The LRC will use the results of this survey to guide the testing and evaluations, and to provide decision makers with technical information for selecting UV disinfection products and application types.
You must be logged in to post a comment.